<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round 2: DRM Is Not Totally 100% Evil But Sometimes Gets Close&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/</link>
	<description>a blog by the digital team at Pan Macmillan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-6416</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-6416</guid>
		<description>politics aside, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drm-removal-tool.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;getting rid of DRM&lt;/a&gt; would probably be good for Apple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>politics aside, <a href="http://www.drm-removal-tool.com/" rel="nofollow">getting rid of DRM</a> would probably be good for Apple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Arriazola</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-6298</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Arriazola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-6298</guid>
		<description>Your new invaluable guideline indicates a whole lot to me and extremely more to my mates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your new invaluable guideline indicates a whole lot to me and extremely more to my mates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishing biz starts decade old DRM debate &#124; Robert Collings :: entrepreneur, raconteur, publisher, muso</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-6008</link>
		<dc:creator>Publishing biz starts decade old DRM debate &#124; Robert Collings :: entrepreneur, raconteur, publisher, muso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-6008</guid>
		<description>[...] has been an interesting debate concerning DRM happening over at Pan Macmillan’s blog the digitalist, whereby digital editor Michael Bhaskar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been an interesting debate concerning DRM happening over at Pan Macmillan’s blog the digitalist, whereby digital editor Michael Bhaskar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publishing biz starts decade old DRM debate &#124; Red Hill Publishing</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-4802</link>
		<dc:creator>Publishing biz starts decade old DRM debate &#124; Red Hill Publishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-4802</guid>
		<description>[...] has been an interesting debate concerning DRM happening over at Pan Macmillan&#8217;s blog the digitalist, whereby digital editor Michael Bhaskar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been an interesting debate concerning DRM happening over at Pan Macmillan&#8217;s blog the digitalist, whereby digital editor Michael Bhaskar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Collings</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-4796</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Collings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-4796</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s why DRM is important: it can be used to facilitate the RESALE of digital content. Let&#039;s call it Digital Resale Management.

Why do I necessarily have to purchase an author&#039;s writings from a recognised ebook retailer when they can sell it to me, and more importantly, why do my friends need to buy it from said retailer when they could buy it directly from me? What matters is that everyone in the value chain is paid: the author; publisher; wholesaler/distributor; and yes, even me for reselling those works.

I recognise anti-DRMers are opposed to locks and keys and rightly so, but some of the arguments are as overly zealous as those made by pro-DRMers. Having worked in and around the music business for the better part of the past decade I&#039;ve heard all these arguments before and I&#039;m really surprised we&#039;re still having this debate.

So yes, locks and keys aka DRM has already failed, but no DRM means no resale. It is definitely time to move the debate beyond linear distribution channels!

Michael Bhaskar, good on you for stepping where others fear to tread. Get in touch, I&#039;ve got a business proposition for you :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s why DRM is important: it can be used to facilitate the RESALE of digital content. Let&#8217;s call it Digital Resale Management.</p>
<p>Why do I necessarily have to purchase an author&#8217;s writings from a recognised ebook retailer when they can sell it to me, and more importantly, why do my friends need to buy it from said retailer when they could buy it directly from me? What matters is that everyone in the value chain is paid: the author; publisher; wholesaler/distributor; and yes, even me for reselling those works.</p>
<p>I recognise anti-DRMers are opposed to locks and keys and rightly so, but some of the arguments are as overly zealous as those made by pro-DRMers. Having worked in and around the music business for the better part of the past decade I&#8217;ve heard all these arguments before and I&#8217;m really surprised we&#8217;re still having this debate.</p>
<p>So yes, locks and keys aka DRM has already failed, but no DRM means no resale. It is definitely time to move the debate beyond linear distribution channels!</p>
<p>Michael Bhaskar, good on you for stepping where others fear to tread. Get in touch, I&#8217;ve got a business proposition for you <img src='http://thedigitalist.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;A publisher that uses DRM is not worth of trust.&#8221; &#171; &#8230; ach, nichts.</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-4792</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;A publisher that uses DRM is not worth of trust.&#8221; &#171; &#8230; ach, nichts.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-4792</guid>
		<description>[...] Kommentaren hochkarätig besetzte Diskussion über Pro und Contra von DRM im Verlagswesen (Teil 1 / Teil 2); die Überschrift zu diesem Artikel habe ich bei Paula in der Kommentarsektion des 2. Teils [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kommentaren hochkarätig besetzte Diskussion über Pro und Contra von DRM im Verlagswesen (Teil 1 / Teil 2); die Überschrift zu diesem Artikel habe ich bei Paula in der Kommentarsektion des 2. Teils [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Knots &#124; The Casual Optimist</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-4784</link>
		<dc:creator>More Knots &#124; The Casual Optimist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-4784</guid>
		<description>[...] debate last week on The Digitalist by having the audacity to suggest that DRM might not be all bad (twice), is having second thoughts: When I wrote the piece I was perhaps slightly self consciously [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debate last week on The Digitalist by having the audacity to suggest that DRM might not be all bad (twice), is having second thoughts: When I wrote the piece I was perhaps slightly self consciously [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon&#8217;s Orwellian deletion of Kindle books &#124; linkthe.com</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-4782</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon&#8217;s Orwellian deletion of Kindle books &#124; linkthe.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-4782</guid>
		<description>[...] this came after a rollicking debate on ebook DRM on Pan Macmillan (UK)&#8217;s The Digitalist blog, wherein publishers, technologists, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this came after a rollicking debate on ebook DRM on Pan Macmillan (UK)&#8217;s The Digitalist blog, wherein publishers, technologists, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon&#8217;s Orwellian deletion of Kindle books &#124; chavansoft</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-4777</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon&#8217;s Orwellian deletion of Kindle books &#124; chavansoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-4777</guid>
		<description>[...] this came after a rollicking debate on ebook DRM on Pan Macmillan (UK)&#8217;s The Digitalist blog, wherein publishers, technologists, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this came after a rollicking debate on ebook DRM on Pan Macmillan (UK)&#8217;s The Digitalist blog, wherein publishers, technologists, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon&#8217;s Orwellian deletion of Kindle books &#171; IcervU News</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalist.net/2009/07/round-2-drm-is-not-totally-100-evil-but-sometimes-gets-close/comment-page-2/#comment-4768</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon&#8217;s Orwellian deletion of Kindle books &#171; IcervU News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalist.net/?p=636#comment-4768</guid>
		<description>[...] this came after a rollicking debate on ebook DRM on Pan Macmillan (UK)&#8217;s The Digitalist blog, wherein publishers, technologists, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this came after a rollicking debate on ebook DRM on Pan Macmillan (UK)&#8217;s The Digitalist blog, wherein publishers, technologists, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

