There is often a perception that digital text is somehow different to print. It hyperlinks, is easy to update and is, according to the argument, filled with pointless invective and ephemera. It doesn’t allow for deep and considered reading, catering as it does for the atrophied attention spans of the Youtube generation. Despite their recreation of print, ebooks are often included in this category.
However the Youtube generation isn’t even reading online. It’s, er, watching Youtube. In “Is Youtube the Next Google” read/write web outlined a growing trend- rather than looking for a search term in Google kids will type into it Youtube and see what turns up. Alex Iskold writes:
“Whenever his son needed any information, he would open up YouTube, type in the search term and then just watch the videos that showed up as matches. He never Googled anything; he never went to any other site; his entire web experience was confined to YouTube videos.”
Doing some comparisons it turns out that for many search terms Youtube offers a viable alternative to Google. Currently Youtube has about half the searches of Google e.g. a lot of searches indeed, and this is growing. Whereas Google is largely text based in the results it throws up, Youtube is by definition visual, you don’t read Youtube you watch it.
This has enormous ramifications. At the moment I am reading a book about the science of reading, about how the act of learning to read reconfigures and restructures our brain. Reading changes us innately and irrecoverably; it is the key in allowing us other points of view, in going beyond ourselves. The author, Maryanne Wolf, is concerned about the transition from print to digital text that I mentioned earlier. This doesn’t worry me- in the book she frequently mentions how it is not so much the content as the mere fact of reading that can be beneficial.
What is more worrying is the way we are evolving out of a text based culture. Sure there will always be a place for the economy and density of text. This place could get ever smaller though. The early days of the internet might come to be viewed as a golden age for text, a time when web sites and blogs poured forth a profusion of words such as the world had never seen, a textual Eden before the video Fall.
Ok, that may be a little dramatic. But this is something we should be thinking a about. While in many ways we live in, and have always lived in, an illiterate culture (and I mean this in a non-pejorative sense), think say of the non text entertainment industries stacked against the text based, this further evolution of a non-text culture presents a profound shift. If people are largely not reading then the very biology of human thought will change, and not for the better. As a species we will be less able to empathise, less able to imagine and less able to articulate and formulate complex thoughts.
While it’s futile to rail against new technologies, and generally I am all for them, the emergence of visualisations, Youtube search and on demand and ubiquitous video presents a massive challenge to educators and publishers. Google is lucky (rich) enough to own Youtube; the same cannot be said of us.


4 Comments
Michael,
I definitely agree that publishers need to be thinking about the rise of video.
There is an advantage to the whole situation that you have – you know how to make quality content/information. In a way, text is just a format of delivery, and in principle you can be delivering content differently. It might be hard to imagine today what could be a video book, but we know that books, like everything else will evolve. So the key to me is the understanding that you hold relationships with authors, you know how to make books, and you are in a good position to figure out how to evolve these relationships into the future.
Alex
Alex- yes, you are right in that we do have those specialisms. What I am not so sure about is how transferable they are. So while we might make a good text book, that involves a lot of print only skills- everything from the editorial work through to typsetting, production etc is geared up for a model fundamentally different to that in, say, TV production. Equally writers might not necessarily make good screen writers, and even if they do it is hard to see how a publisher could intermediate in that environment seeing as it is already crowded and competitive with experts.
What I think we really can do is learn to tie video into print more. Look at how the newspapers regularly have video snippets above the print articles. If people will search on Youtube then our books will need to be found on Youtube, but that doesn’t mean abandoning books altogether. So in that sense I do agree- we have to evolve it in the right way. Of course, perhaps the great irony of the whole Youtube generation/transition is that it effects traditional TV as much as it does anything else- they are feeling the pressure from falling and inattentive audiences, UGC, piracy, visuals with no ads and the rest of it more than we publishers, the proverbial tortoise to the hare.
MB
I don’t worry so much. I believe that people are reading even more than before with this “golden age for text”, and I don’t see the internet as moving toward more video than text — YouTube is an addition, not a replacement for written blogs and websites. And a well-made video (or video series) requires sustained thought, like a well-made blog post.
I am incredibly amused that something called “Demon Killer” comes in a juice box
5 Trackbacks
[...] Ce billet fait écho à celui d’Alex Iskold sur Read Write Web, qui a suscité une intéressante réaction sur The Digitalist. [...]
[...] post on the Reading and Watching conference a few weeks ago, I recently came about this very nice post by Michael Bhaskar over at The Digitalist. In his post Bashkar talks about a blog post from [...]
[...] Janneke Adema, and related to this, Michael Bhaskar at The Digitalist envisions an evolution away from a text-based culture and text-bas…: However the Youtube generation isn’t even reading online. It’s, er, watching Youtube. [...]
[...] Bhaskar from thedigitalist.net wonders about the possibility of a video generation, and what this might mean for literacy, capacity for critical thinking, mental efficiency, and culture ov…. Referring to Maryanne Wolf’s excellent “Proust & the Squid,” he worries: . . [...]
[...] An interesting musing on visuals and text [...]