Over the next few days I am going to blog a piece I have written for a US-based library journal, Library Trends, on how traditional publishers need to position themselves in the changing media flows of a networked era. It’s a very long article so I’m gonna serialise it and blog it in six ‘bite-sized’ chunks over six days. Here’s the introduction, which aims to set the picture. Scary.
Print sales are falling. According to the National Endowment for the Arts’ 2007 report To Read or Not to Read both reading standards and voluntary reading rates of traditional print material amongst young people are falling. Textbook publishers are fighting for sales; campaigning to alert students to the necessity of using their products. Hardback fiction has almost gone the way of the dinosaur. The open access debate rages on. Publishers and retailers have consolidated. More and more books are produced, but there is less and less choice on the high street. Leisure time is transferring away from books and reading, away from television even, to the Web; to social networking sites, blogs, instant messaging, video and music file sharing sites. The attention economy is shrinking, fast. Academic research is – for many students – all about search. Let’s face it, for most students, actually, it’s all about Google. Who needs books anymore? More to the point, who needs publishers?
In an ‘always on’ world in which everything is increasingly digital, where content is increasingly fragmented and ‘bite-sized’, where ‘prosumers’ merge the traditionally disparate roles of producer and consumer, where search replaces the library and where multimedia mash-ups – not text – holds the attraction for the digital natives who are growing up fast into the mass market of tomorrow, what role do publishers still have to play and how will they have to evolve to hold on to a continuing role in the writing and reading culture of the future? Will there even be a writing and reading culture as we know it, tomorrow? Is the publishing industry acting fast enough and working creatively enough to adapt to the new information and leisure economies?
Publishing is an old and established industry with its foundations firmly rooted in print culture. The publishing model has evolved over history in a very slow, organic fashion. The sedate pace of change has suited publishers. Stated simply, the journey of a text from author to reader has been a linear one, with publishers traditionally fulfilling the intermediary roles of arbiter, filter, custodian, marketer and distributor. There has been some blurring at the edges, some tinkering with the process, but little radical change. In the literary world, agents have, at least partially, usurped the arbiter and filter roles. Retailers have become, to some extent, marketers and, occasionally, have even become publishers themselves. However, by and large, the stages in the process have been clearly delineated and the role of the publisher clearly defined. From a print perspective at least, publishers have offered one key, relatively unique set of abilities: to produce, store and distribute the product to the market. The rise and rise of the Internet has begun to disrupt this linear structure and to introduce the circularity of a network. More challengingly, perhaps, it has raised the distinct possibility of publisher disintermediation by more or less removing as an obstacle the one critical offering previously unique to publishers – distribution.
Publishers – and, importantly, authors – will need increasingly to accept huge cultural and social and economic and educational changes and to respond to these in a positive and creative way. We will need to think much less about products and much more about content; we will need to think of ‘the book’ as a core or base structure but perhaps one with more porous edges than it has had before. We will need to work out how to position the book at the centre of a network rather than how to distribute it to the end of a chain. We will need to recognise that readers are also writers and opinion formers and that those operate online within and across networks. We will need to understand that parts of books reference parts of other books and that now the network of meaning can be woven together digitally in a very real way, between content published and hosted by entirely separate entities. Perhaps most radically, we will have to consider whether a primary focus on text is enough in a world of multimedia mash-ups. In other words, publishers will need to think entirely differently about the very nature of the book and, in parallel, about how to market and sell those ‘books’ in the context of a wired world. Crucially, we will need to work out how we can add value as publishers within a circular, networked environment.
One of the key perception shifts that publishers need to make, then, is about the book as ‘product’. Whilst the book continues to be viewed as a definable object within covers, as a singular ‘unit’, publishers will continue to limit their role in its production and distribution, and this is a sure fire way for publishers to write themselves out of the future of content creation and dissemination. There are two areas of activity in the linear progression of a text between author and reader which have previously remained hidden to the reader: the development of the text itself; the writing and editing process, and the sales, marketing and distribution of the text. Readers have traditionally had no role in the former and only a limited role in the latter, through word of mouth recommendations or viral marketing. It is likely that today’s digital natives, who have become ‘prosumers’ (producer / consumers) with alarming speed and perhaps even more alarmingly different levels of proficiency, will expect a great deal more involvement in both of these areas of activity if they are to be engaged by texts. Witness two main stream examples, the Star Wars films and the Harry Potter books and films, both of which have developed massive prosumer (or ‘superfan’) followings, and both of which have seen conflict between the film companies and the fans that are creating content.
A minority of publishers have begun to experiment with the blurring of these traditionally distinct boundaries already. Chris Anderson’s The Long Tail was of course written ‘in public’ via a blog, allowing readers to post comments and to be involved in the very act of writing the book. O’Reilly’s Rough Cuts make a virtue of the concept of developing a book online first and have established a business model for combining pre-publication and post-publication access. McKenzie Wark’s Gamer Theory was also blogged before it was produced as a book, allowing readers to post comments and to make suggestions about the shape of the book. GAM3R 7H30RY 1.1 was “a first stab at a new sort of “networked book,” a book that actually contains the conversation it engenders, and which, in turn, engenders it.” At http://www.futureofthebook.org/mckenziewark/ readers can read the original version (v1.1), view the fully annotated version with all the reader comments alongside the core text, read v2.0, join a related discussion forum or view visualisations of theories within the text.
The locked-in perception of the book as a unit or a product has also led to digital ‘strategies’ which largely consist of the digitisation of existing print texts in order to create eBooks. This in turn has led to an obsessive focus on the reading device and a perception that the emergence of a ‘killer device’ will be a key driver in unlocking a digital future for books in the way that the iPod was, say, for music. This is a flawed perspective in a number of ways, not least because it fails to recognise the enormous amount of online or digital ‘reading’ that already takes place on non-book-specific devices such as desktop PCs, laptops, PDAs and mobiles, but also because it fails to recognise that the very nature of books and reading is changing and will continue to change substantially. What is absolutely clear is that publishers need to become enablers for reading and its associated processes (discussion; research; note-taking; writing; reference following) to take place across a multitude of platforms and throughout all the varying modes of a readers’ activities and lifestyle.


9 Comments
Sara,
A great initial summary! Looking forward to the rest!
Eoin
Very interesting. French traduction, if trackback don’t work : http://lafeuille.homo-numericus.net/2008/05/un-manifeste-de-lediteur-numerique.html
Hi Sara,
Thanks for these wonderful posts.
Here’s one comment. You wrote: “Hardback fiction has almost gone the way of the dinosaur.”
However, according to this year’s recent report by the American Association of Publishers:
“The strongest growth in this category came from adult hardbound books whose sales rose 7.8 percent on last year to a total of $2.8 billion with a compound growth rate of 3.4 percent.”
Read their full report, plus the complete 3-year data here: http://www.publishers.org/main/IndustryStats/indStats_02.htm
So, what does this mean? It does not imply that online publishing is hype. That is certainly on the rise as well. I think it further defines people’s purpose for reading – where, why, how, and why they’re reading. It’s not necessarily about some kind of format war. It’s about situation, preference; in essence, the consumer. Readers read, and they’ll do it in many ways, places, etc. that best suit them. As you point out, publishers definitely need to be very aware of this, and accommodate readers in more ways than they are currently.
Looking forward to reading the rest of this series,
Jon
Thank you for starting the discussion on this topic. I am an avid reader and I worked in publishing for 30 years. I am eager to read the remaining parts of your blog on this topic. Increasingly, I want to have “access” to content. I still prefer to actually purchase a finite – printed – product. But, I am frustrated that I do not have acces to all of this product when, when and how I need / want it.
While I agree that looking for the “perfect” digital machine is not practical for book publishers, I have to at least reference what the iPod has done for me and my music collection. Now that I have copied my entire music library to my iPod I have access to all of the music that I own – but had rarely listened to because it was inconvenient to carry it with me on my travles (lost CDs, extra equipment to carry, etc.) Now I have “newly discovered” the music that I forgot that I already owned – I listen to more music AND… I purchase more music as a result – because I can now access it whenever I want, wherever I am and in whatever manner that is most conventient for me at the time.
Keep writing – and discussing – this topic. I am all ears and eyes!
Sara Lloyd of The Digitalist has a series on the future of publishing in the 21st century. The series sets some of publisher’s challenges into context.
A sure sign of a good book is that you like it more the older you get.
It is the coolest site,keep so!
Lee and Low Books is an independent children’s book publisher specializing in diversity. They take pride in nurturing many minority authors and illustrators who are new to the world of children’s book publishing.
For more about their history and their books, visit:
Minority Book Publisher
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading Married Men Seeking Married Men and for more Married Women Seeking Married Women
25 Trackbacks
[...] the digitalist, Writing Sara Loyd, over at Pan Macmillan’s blog the digitalist, has posted the first instalment of what’s shaping up to be a superb essay on the future of publishing. Here’s an [...]
[...] read Part One and Part [...]
[...] A book publisher’s manifesto for the 21st century – by Sara Lloyd of Pan Macmillan. A must read — finding just one great quote of the week was rough! [...]
[...] Un propos que je partage entièrement en tout cas. Je me suis permis de traduire une bonne partie de l’introduction : “Existera-t-il une culture de l’écriture et de la lecture telle que nous la [...]
[...] – thedigitalist.net » A book publisher’s manifesto for the 21st century “Over the next few days I am going to blog a piece I have written for a US-based library [...]
[...] A book publisher’s manifesto for the 21st century [...]
[...] finally, a nice series of articles by Sara Lloyd at MacMillan on considerations for book publishers in the digital [...]
[...] Part 1 [...]
[...] Lloyd has blogged “A Book Publisher’s Manifesto for the 21st Century”[1]: …the very nature of books and reading is changing and will continue to change [...]
[...] 25 May, 2008 in Genre Fiction, Publishing Tags: deep niches, Harlequin, long tail, Publishing, sara loyd, the digitalist, Tor It’s been a hellish sort of week so I’m a little behind with my feeds, but tonight I finished the last two instalments of Sara Loyd’s outstanding essay A book publisher’s manifesto for the 21st century. [...]
[...] Thoughts on A Publisher’s Manifesto Posted on June 19, 2008 by gaizabonts While it was interesting to discover thedigitalist.net, it was a pleasant surprise to read this article as an introduction to the blog, and even more so to read it on a publisher’s blog. “One of the key perception shifts that publishers need to make, then, is about the book as ‘product’. Whilst the book continues to be viewed as a definable object within covers, as a singular ‘unit’, publishers will continue to limit their role in its production and distribution, and this is a sure fire way for publishers to write themselves out of the future of content creation and dissemination. There are two areas of activity in the linear progression of a text between author and reader which have previously remained hidden to the reader: the development of the text itself; the writing and editing process, and the sales, marketing and distribution of the text. Readers have traditionally had no role in the former and only a limited role in the latter, through word of mouth recommendations or viral marketing. It is likely that today’s digital natives, who have become ‘prosumers’ (producer / consumers) with alarming speed and perhaps even more alarmingly different levels of proficiency, will expect a great deal more involvement in both of these areas of activity if they are to be engaged by texts. Witness two main stream examples, the Star Wars films and the Harry Potter books and films, both of which have developed massive prosumer (or ‘superfan’) followings, and both of which have seen conflict between the film companies and the fans that are creating content.”: thedigitalist.net » A book publisher’s manifesto for the 21st century [...]
[...] While it was interesting to discover thedigitalist.net, it was a pleasant surprise to read this article as an introduction to the blog, and even more so to read it on a publisher’s blog. “One of the key perception shifts that publishers need to make, then, is about the book as ‘product’. Whilst the book continues to be viewed as a definable object within covers, as a singular ‘unit’, publishers will continue to limit their role in its production and distribution, and this is a sure fire way for publishers to write themselves out of the future of content creation and dissemination. There are two areas of activity in the linear progression of a text between author and reader which have previously remained hidden to the reader: the development of the text itself; the writing and editing process, and the sales, marketing and distribution of the text. Readers have traditionally had no role in the former and only a limited role in the latter, through word of mouth recommendations or viral marketing. It is likely that today’s digital natives, who have become ‘prosumers’ (producer / consumers) with alarming speed and perhaps even more alarmingly different levels of proficiency, will expect a great deal more involvement in both of these areas of activity if they are to be engaged by texts. Witness two main stream examples, the Star Wars films and the Harry Potter books and films, both of which have developed massive prosumer (or ‘superfan’) followings, and both of which have seen conflict between the film companies and the fans that are creating content.”: thedigitalist.net » A book publisher’s manifesto for the 21st century [...]
[...] Sarah Loud,head of digital publishing at Pan Macmillan, has published a much talked about Publisher’s manifesto for the 21st Century over at The Digatilist. [...]
[...] boldly come up with controversial visions of the future as in my Publisher’s Manifesto [Part 1, 2, 3] – whether or not any of it will turn out to be correct is irrelevant; it was all stirring [...]
[...] I think that’s the right reaction. Even within the belly of the corporate publishing beast, some are working hard to transform [...]
[...] the potential of new media as a career path for writers. Preparatory Reading for this session: Book Publisher’s Manifesto for the 21st century by Sara Lloyd Digital Livings by Chris [...]
[...] of Publishing in the Networked Era,” posted at The Institute for the Future of the Book, and Sara Lloyd’s “Book Publisher’s Manifesto for the 21st Century,” originally published in Library Trends but reprinted at The [...]
[...] are some encouraging signs that the publishing business are trying to make some good changes. Let’s hope they keep going [...]
[...] are some encouraging signs that the publishing business are trying to make some good changes. Let’s hope they keep going [...]
[...] are some encouraging signs that the publishing business are trying to make some good changes. Let’s hope they keep going [...]
[...] Pour ceux qui préfèrent la VO http://thedigitalist.net/?p=137 [...]
[...] all of you interested in what the future of publishing will look like, Sara Lloyd has begun posting her essay on the topic over at the digitalist (the digital team at Pan Macmillan’s blog). Because of [...]
[...] yet seen Sara Lloyd’s excellent piece for US-based library journal, Library Trends, called A Book Publisher’s Manifesto for the 21st Century, on how traditional publishers need to adapt to the new media economy – something we’re [...]
[...] yet seen Sara Lloyd’s excellent piece for US-based library journal, Library Trends, called A Book Publisher’s Manifesto for the 21st Century, on how traditional publishers need to adapt to the new media economy – something we’re [...]
[...] initiative from Macmillan (I am referring to the Publishers’ Manifesto [Summary | Full PDF Download] that they came up with a while [...]